It's funny, I have no recollection whatever of talking about Jack Wright or of arguing with Sean Bonney about my imminent text "Blake in Cambridge" ("fuzzy") ... This suggests a new form of collective amateur psychoanalysis: we record ourselves whilst drinking copious amounts of beer and then hand over to the tapes to an interested party who can then transcribe choice morsels of argy-barge. Since, unlike bourgeois politicians, AMM members have nothing to hide - we don't gain anything by lying - we can do this without compromising the organisation (I like that George Clinton interview where he points out that he declares he likes drugs and pussy so he's not afraid that someone will use these things against him). What do people think? OTL
It's funny, I have no recollection whatever of talking about Jack Wright or of arguing with Sean Bonney about my imminent text "Blake in Cambridge" ("fuzzy") ... This suggests a new form of collective amateur psychoanalysis: we record ourselves whilst drinking copious amounts of beer and then hand over to the tapes to an interested party who can then transcribe choice morsels of argy-barge. Since, unlike bourgeois politicians, AMM members have nothing to hide - we don't gain anything by lying - we can do this without compromising the organisation (I like that George Clinton interview where he points out that he declares he likes drugs and pussy so he's not afraid that someone will use these things against him). What do people think? OTL
ReplyDelete